Indian Open Rubik's Cube 2015


Date
Mar 20 - 22, 2015
City
Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Venue

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur

Address
IIT NH 91, IIT Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208016
Details

Lecture Hall 7

Website
Indian Open Rubik's Cube 2015 website
Contact

Shivam Yadav, Kailash Kumar, Pranav Maneriker

Organizers
Kailash Kumar, Pranav Maneriker, and Shivam Yadav
WCA Delegate
Nikhil Mande
Information

For more information, visit the competition's website.

Events
Main event
Competitors
50
Registration period

Online registration opened and closed .

Registration requirements
This competition is over, click here to display the registration requirements it used.
Create a WCA account here if you don't have one.
If this is not your first competition, associate your WCA ID to your WCA account here.
Register for this competition here.
Highlights
Click here to display the highlights of the competition.

Bhargav Narasimhan won with an average of 10.65 seconds in the 3x3x3 Cube event. Nikhil Mande finished second (15.35) and Ammar Haider finished third (15.90).

3x3x3 Cube

# Name Best Average Representing Solves
1 Bhargav Narasimhan 9.83 10.65 India 10.219.8310.2213.0811.51
2 Nikhil Mande 12.96 15.35 India 14.6512.9617.5217.2114.19
3 Ammar Haider 10.70 15.90 India 15.3310.7014.0632.1118.32

2x2x2 Cube

# Name Best Average Representing Solves
1 Bhargav Narasimhan 3.22 3.55 India 3.313.974.213.383.22
2 Prakhar Gupta 2.96 4.02 India 8.993.684.374.012.96
3 Nikhil Mande 3.46 5.31 India 5.727.314.006.223.46

4x4x4 Cube

# Name Best Average Representing Solves
1 Bhargav Narasimhan 44.65 49.05 India 44.6549.8148.4151.6048.93
2 Qumber Hussain 51.17 58.89 India 1:04.6255.641:05.0856.4051.17
3 Ammar Haider 51.69 1:00.51 India 51.691:04.561:10.501:03.4653.50

5x5x5 Cube

# Name Best Average Representing Solves
1 Bhargav Narasimhan 1:40.23 1:51.64 India 1:44.682:02.561:40.232:02.711:47.68
2 Ammar Haider 1:56.97 2:05.86 India 2:02.652:11.412:31.222:03.511:56.97
3 Qumber Hussain 2:16.38 2:22.19 India 2:16.382:18.203:08.242:23.382:24.98

3x3x3 Blindfolded

# Name Best Average Representing Solves
1 Nikhil Mande 1:05.01 DNF India DNF1:16.381:05.01
2 Prabal Khare 1:52.05 2:19.13 India 1:52.052:23.062:42.28
3 Kailash Kumar 4:06.30 DNF India 4:06.30DNFDNF

3x3x3 Fewest Moves

# Name Best Average Representing Solves
1 Nikhil Mande 28 31.67 NR India 292838
2 Prakhar Gupta 29 33.00 India 294030
3 Bhargav Narasimhan 34 34.33 India 353434

3x3x3 One-Handed

# Name Best Average Representing Solves
1 Bhargav Narasimhan 14.26 14.95 India 14.9414.3214.2615.6015.62
2 Ammar Haider 22.63 29.23 India 32.0926.4431.3122.6329.93
3 Qumber Hussain 27.90 31.80 India 31.9635.1527.9031.4232.02

Megaminx

# Name Best Average Representing Solves
1 Bhargav Narasimhan 51.65 NR 1:03.07 NR India 1:03.211:00.791:05.211:07.0851.65
2 Prakhar Gupta 1:34.90 1:42.59 India 1:46.491:42.861:38.431:49.281:34.90
3 Ammar Haider 2:03.41 2:14.23 India 2:16.412:09.162:03.412:17.132:32.13

Pyraminx

# Name Best Average Representing Solves
1 Ammar Haider 5.03 6.38 India 10.476.225.895.037.04
2 Akash Kumar Jaiswal 5.97 7.27 India 6.449.695.977.338.05
3 Bhargav Narasimhan 6.74 8.14 India 8.976.748.868.187.37

Skewb

# Name Best Average Representing Solves
1 Bhargav Narasimhan 4.48 5.84 India 7.156.555.695.294.48
2 Anuj Menta 4.94 5.97 India 6.555.995.374.947.08
3 Prakhar Gupta 8.97 10.90 India 16.3910.6610.388.9711.67

Square-1

# Name Best Average Representing Solves
1 Ammar Haider 17.06 36.12 India 23.5950.4837.8817.0646.88
2 Bhargav Narasimhan 28.21 52.23 India 46.5055.0828.2155.121:04.01
3 Qumber Hussain 40.35 1:08.26 India DNF1:09.211:02.051:13.5340.35

3x3x3 Multi-Blind

# Name Best Average Representing Solves
1 Nikhil Mande 11/16 1:00:00 India 11/16 1:00:00DNF5/9 43:45
2 Kailash Kumar 2/2 11:34 India DNF2/2 11:34DNF
3 Prabal Khare 2/2 13:09 India 2/2 13:092/3 24:462/3 28:11
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.